Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 14 - Jul 19
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
EBC 13-17 Honda Accord Coupe 2.4 EX Redstuff Front Brake PadsThere are TWO reasons our customers love Redstuff, First because they are the lowest dust pad we have encountered by reducing dust by 60 90 percent. Plus the minimal dust you see is very easily removed with a simple sponge wash as it contains no steel fibre particles as in ALL OTHER pads. Second they brake like an alligator right from cold (as good as Original pads or better) and just get better as they heat up. This material is a Synthetic Fiber
There are TWO reasons our customers love Redstuff, First because they are the lowest dust pad we have encountered by reducing dust by 60-90-percent. Plus the minimal dust you see is very easily removed with a simple sponge wash as it contains no steel fibre particles as in ALL OTHER pads. Second they brake like an alligator right from cold (as good as Original pads or better) and just get better as they heat up.This material is a Synthetic Fiber based brake compound enhanced with ceramic particles. If you have previously tried EBC redstuff (pre-ceramic compound) this material is light years ahead. It lasts longer; it brakes better and is quieter. Being a hard wearing pad, bed-in times can be as long as 1000 miles and drivers must be patient until the pad takes up the shape of their disc (brake rotor). This is a truly impressive fast road pad for repeated heavy braking.It emits far less dust than semi-metallic pads and has been proven to stop a passenger car/sedan/sport compact/hot hatch 13 metres quicker than OEM pads from 100mph/160kph. Features EBC Brake-In surface coating which conditions rotor surface and accelerates pad bed-in. Nominal friction coefficient 0.5 with approx. 50-percent dust reduction.Most EBC Red Ceramic pads are approved to ECE R90 brake safety regulation.This Part Fits:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-2020,2023 | Honda | Accord | EX |
| 2013-2022 | Honda | Accord | EX-L |
| 2014-2015,2017-2022 | Honda | Accord | Hybrid |
| 2018-2021 | Honda | Accord | Hybrid EX |
| 2014-2015,2017-2023 | Honda | Accord | Hybrid EX-L |
| 2022-2023 | Honda | Accord | Hybrid Sport |
| 2023 | Honda | Accord | Hybrid Sport-L |
| 2014-2015,2017-2023 | Honda | Accord | Hybrid Touring |
| 2018-2023,2026 | Honda | Accord | LX |
| 2016 | Honda | Accord | LX-S |
| 2021-2022 | Honda | Accord | Sport |
| 2021-2022 | Honda | Accord | Sport SE |
| 2013-2015,2021-2022 | Honda | Accord | Touring |
| 2016-2022 | Honda | HR-V | EX |
| 2016-2023 | Honda | HR-V | EX-L |
| 2016-2023 | Honda | HR-V | LX |
| 2019-2023 | Honda | HR-V | Sport |
| 2019-2020 | Honda | HR-V | Touring |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 2500 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Fits good just needs a light ironing.
Good fit with a casual look. These are a nice fit with an almost slim fit width at the bottom. I am a short guy and the 34x28 size fit me great. As I obviously don't have a trim waistline, I like that the bottom of these are narrower than a more dressier pant. The waist of my pants tend to move up and down approx. an inch to inch and a half and slacks tend to get under the heel of the less clunky modern dress casual shoe. Comparison below.
Amazon Essentials 34x28 were a lot tighter (like a 32)in the waist and the length seemed loo long.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 17, 2018
★★★★★ 5
good value
Size: 40W x 28L, Color: Brown
Top quality, very comfortable, soft fabric, I like them very much.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Functional pants, safe bed, accurate color.
Size: 34W x 32L, Color: Dark Olive, Size: 34W x 32L, Color: Dark Olive
I think these pants are very functional, the color is very accurate, the fit is good, I think it is a very safe choice for someone looking for safe pick.
I have not tried washing them so i am not sure about wrinkle resistance, I may update my review later. But out of the box, they were not wrinkled.
Thickness is decent, not too thick or thin.
Since I got it for some discount, the value was good.
The image is in yellow lighting.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great fit
Size: 38W x 29L, Color: Black
Bought for a friend He loves them Fit well
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2026
★★★★★ 3
You get what you pay for.
I have 4 pairs of these pants. Originally, I gave them a five star review because the fit was perfect, they are comfortable, and looked nice. I have worn them several times and they seemed to be well made.
However, I've changed my rating to three stars. I've washed 3 of the 4 pairs I bought. The black pair came out o.k.. The olive and grey pairs are not color fast. The olive pair faded considerably in the wash and has a definite brown tinge to it in the thighs and knees. The grey pair did not fade as much, but you can also see that brown tinge in the thighs and knees. I can still wear them as work pants, but I was disappointed. I have also noticed that the inside of the front pockets have excessive wear.
The bottom line is that these pants do not cost much, but will probably not last long. Are they worth $30? Personally, I'd rather pay more and get better quality. I had put several other Goodthreads items on my wishlist, but now I'm rethinking that.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 31, 2020